We simulated Hartford Athletic vs Charleston Battery 100,000 times. Charleston Battery won 38,515 of them (38.5%), the draw came up 23.8% of the time and Hartford Athletic won 37.7%. No single score is common: 1-1 is the likeliest at 10.9%, while the likeliest Charleston Battery win is 1-2 (8.3%). Both teams score in 59.9% of simulations.
| Hartford Athletic win | 37.7% |
|---|---|
| Draw | 23.8% |
| Charleston Battery win | 38.5% |
| Most likely score | 1-1 (10.9%) |
| Expected goals | 1.50 – 1.52 |
| Both teams to score | 59.9% |
| Over 1.5 goals | 79.9% |
| Over 2.5 goals | 57.9% |
|---|---|
| Over 3.5 goals | 35.7% |
| Hartford Athletic score first | 43.8% |
| Charleston Battery score first | 51.1% |
| Hartford Athletic clean sheet | 22.3% |
| Charleston Battery clean sheet | 22.7% |
Rhode Island
Loudoun United
2.0–0.9
xG
55%
Over 2.5
Miami FC II
Charleston Battery
1.5–1.6
xG
60%
Over 2.5
Louisville City
Indy Eleven
2.0–1.0
xG
57%
Over 2.5
Hartford Athletic
Brooklyn FC
2.7–0.8
xG
67%
Over 2.5
Rhode Island
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
1.5–0.7
xG
37%
Over 2.5
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Detroit City
1.5–0.9
xG
43%
Over 2.5
Tulsa Roughnecks
Oakland Roots
1.5–1.1
xG
48%
Over 2.5
San Antonio
New Mexico United
1.5–1.2
xG
48%
Over 2.5
Every number on this page comes from one request: 1X2, scorelines, goal lines, halves, HT/FT, Asian handicaps, corners, cards and goal timing, plus the market comparison, value bets and the full expected-goals breakdown. Up to ten fixtures per call.
GET /api/predictions/generate/420520161 ?v=2 &detail=standard &include=value,corners,cards # 100,000 runs: 1X2, scores, goals, halves, # corners, cards, value bets, xG breakdown
Charleston Battery are favourites. They win 38.5% of our 100,000 simulations, against 23.8% for the draw and 37.7% for Hartford Athletic. Including the draw, Charleston Battery avoid defeat 62.3% of the time.
1-1, which came up in 10.9% of simulations. Next are 1-2 (8.3%) and 2-1 (8.2%). The likeliest Charleston Battery win is 1-2 (8.3%). No single score is likely on its own, which is why the full spread of scorelines matters.
Both teams score in 59.9% of simulations. Hartford Athletic keep a clean sheet 22.3% of the time and Charleston Battery 22.7%.
The simulations average 3.02 goals: 1.50 for Hartford Athletic and 1.52 for Charleston Battery. Over 1.5 goals lands 79.9% of the time, over 2.5 goals 57.9% and over 3.5 goals 35.7%.
Our v2 engine plays the match 100,000 times. It starts from the sharpest betting market (here Pinnacle), blends in each team's recent attack and defence numbers and xG, then uses a Dixon-Coles model so low scores like 0-0 and 1-1 come up as often as they do in real football. Goal times, corners and cards are simulated minute by minute.
Every 20 minutes on matchday and every few hours before that, so it moves with team news and the betting market. The last pre-match run stays on the page after kick-off so you can compare it with the result.
