Join The Team!
A signing like no other...
Every Premier League outfielder ranked by how often they clear their own DefCon threshold.
Clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles.
The same four, plus ball recoveries.
Ten actions and twenty actions pay exactly the same.
| # | Player | Price | Owned | Mins | Actions per 90 vs threshold | Hit rate | Pts/90 | Per £m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
£5.5m | 0.3% | 2,207 | 1.52 | 0.28 | ||
| 2 |
|
£5.0m | 0.3% | 1,901 | 1.45 | 0.29 | ||
| 3 |
|
£6.5m | 12.1% | 3,332 | 1.31 | 0.20 | ||
| 4 |
|
£6.0m | 11.0% | 3,288 | 1.31 | 0.22 | ||
| 5 |
|
£5.0m | 0.2% | 1,489 | 1.22 | 0.24 | ||
| 6 |
|
£5.5m | 1.3% | 2,102 | 1.19 | 0.22 | ||
| 7 |
|
£5.0m | 3.1% | 2,144 | 1.18 | 0.24 | ||
| 8 |
|
£5.0m | 0.5% | 1,331 | 1.17 | 0.23 | ||
| 9 |
|
£6.0m | 12.1% | 3,085 | 1.17 | 0.19 | ||
| 10 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 872 | 1.11 | 0.22 | ||
| 11 |
|
£4.5m | 0.4% | 1,816 | 1.11 | 0.25 | ||
| 12 |
|
£5.5m | 0.1% | 1,880 | 1.10 | 0.20 | ||
| 13 |
|
£5.0m | 0.0% | 1,718 | 1.10 | 0.22 | ||
| 14 |
|
£5.0m | 0.0% | 876 | 1.09 | 0.22 | ||
| 15 |
|
£5.0m | 1.5% | 2,588 | 1.09 | 0.22 | ||
| 16 |
|
£4.5m | 0.0% | 935 | 1.08 | 0.24 | ||
| 17 |
|
£5.0m | 0.4% | 1,834 | 1.07 | 0.21 | ||
| 18 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 2,882 | 1.05 | 0.21 | ||
| 19 |
|
£5.0m | 0.3% | 1,888 | 1.04 | 0.21 | ||
| 20 |
|
£6.0m | 9.8% | 3,330 | 1.04 | 0.17 | ||
| 21 |
|
£4.5m | 0.1% | 788 | 1.01 | 0.23 | ||
| 22 |
|
£5.0m | 1.2% | 2,797 | 1.00 | 0.20 | ||
| 23 |
|
£5.0m | 0.8% | 2,825 | 0.97 | 0.19 | ||
| 24 |
|
£6.0m | 1.6% | 2,848 | 0.97 | 0.16 | ||
| 25 |
|
£6.0m | 1.0% | 3,413 | 0.97 | 0.16 | ||
| 26 |
|
£5.5m | 1.4% | 3,119 | 0.94 | 0.17 | ||
| 27 |
|
£5.5m | 2.0% | 2,971 | 0.92 | 0.17 | ||
| 28 |
|
£5.5m | 3.8% | 2,796 | 0.88 | 0.16 | ||
| 29 |
|
£6.5m | 0.1% | 1,510 | 0.87 | 0.13 | ||
| 30 |
|
£4.5m | 0.9% | 1,805 | 0.86 | 0.19 | ||
| 31 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 1,340 | 0.85 | 0.17 | ||
| 32 |
|
£5.0m | 1.1% | 1,869 | 0.85 | 0.17 | ||
| 33 |
|
£5.5m | 0.2% | 2,130 | 0.85 | 0.15 | ||
| 34 |
|
£6.5m | 16.2% | 3,420 | 0.84 | 0.13 | ||
| 35 |
|
£5.0m | 0.7% | 1,769 | 0.82 | 0.16 | ||
| 36 |
|
£5.0m | 1.6% | 2,652 | 0.81 | 0.16 | ||
| 37 |
|
£5.5m | 0.1% | 1,561 | 0.81 | 0.15 | ||
| 38 |
|
£5.0m | 2.7% | 2,195 | 0.81 | 0.16 | ||
| 39 |
|
£5.0m | 0.4% | 2,073 | 0.80 | 0.16 | ||
| 40 |
|
£5.0m | 0.2% | 1,089 | 0.80 | 0.16 | ||
| 41 |
|
£5.0m | 0.5% | 2,935 | 0.80 | 0.16 | ||
| 42 |
|
£5.0m | 0.4% | 1,388 | 0.79 | 0.16 | ||
| 43 |
|
£8.0m | 25.6% | 2,750 | 0.79 | 0.10 | ||
| 44 |
|
£5.5m | 6.2% | 2,901 | 0.77 | 0.14 | ||
| 45 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 1,722 | 0.76 | 0.15 | ||
| 46 |
|
£5.0m | 8.1% | 3,210 | 0.75 | 0.15 | ||
| 47 |
|
£5.0m | 2.3% | 2,963 | 0.74 | 0.15 | ||
| 48 |
|
£5.0m | 0.7% | 2,761 | 0.74 | 0.15 | ||
| 49 |
|
£5.0m | 0.6% | 1,646 | 0.74 | 0.15 | ||
| 50 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 1,477 | 0.74 | 0.15 | ||
| 51 |
|
£6.0m | 4.0% | 3,017 | 0.73 | 0.12 | ||
| 52 |
|
£5.5m | 7.6% | 2,784 | 0.73 | 0.13 | ||
| 53 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 1,434 | 0.73 | 0.15 | ||
| 54 |
|
£7.5m | 22.3% | 3,093 | 0.72 | 0.10 | ||
| 55 |
|
£4.5m | 0.3% | 920 | 0.72 | 0.16 | ||
| 56 |
|
£5.0m | 0.0% | 1,755 | 0.71 | 0.14 | ||
| 57 |
|
£5.5m | 0.1% | 1,923 | 0.70 | 0.13 | ||
| 58 |
|
£4.5m | 0.5% | 1,893 | 0.69 | 0.15 | ||
| 59 |
|
£5.5m | 0.0% | 1,950 | 0.68 | 0.12 | ||
| 60 |
|
£5.5m | 2.1% | 2,780 | 0.68 | 0.12 | ||
| 61 |
|
£4.5m | 0.0% | 470 | 0.67 | 0.15 | ||
| 62 |
|
£5.5m | 4.6% | 1,787 | 0.67 | 0.12 | ||
| 63 |
|
£5.5m | 1.9% | 678 | 0.66 | 0.12 | ||
| 64 |
|
£4.5m | 0.1% | 799 | 0.66 | 0.15 | ||
| 65 |
|
£5.5m | 0.2% | 2,552 | 0.65 | 0.12 | ||
| 66 |
|
£5.5m | 17.2% | 986 | 0.65 | 0.12 | ||
| 67 |
|
£4.5m | 0.8% | 977 | 0.65 | 0.14 | ||
| 68 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 978 | 0.63 | 0.13 | ||
| 69 |
|
£4.5m | 1.9% | 2,952 | 0.63 | 0.14 | ||
| 70 |
|
£5.5m | 2.2% | 3,375 | 0.62 | 0.11 | ||
| 71 |
|
£5.5m | 0.7% | 2,046 | 0.62 | 0.11 | ||
| 72 |
|
£5.0m | 0.1% | 1,168 | 0.62 | 0.12 | ||
| 73 |
|
£4.5m | 0.2% | 1,791 | 0.61 | 0.13 | ||
| 74 |
|
£5.5m | 0.5% | 1,921 | 0.60 | 0.11 | ||
| 75 |
|
£5.0m | 7.4% | 1,649 | 0.59 | 0.12 | ||
| 76 |
|
£4.5m | 3.1% | 1,487 | 0.59 | 0.13 | ||
| 77 |
|
£5.0m | 0.2% | 1,275 | 0.59 | 0.12 | ||
| 78 |
|
£5.0m | 0.0% | 1,170 | 0.58 | 0.12 | ||
| 79 |
|
£5.0m | 0.6% | 1,730 | 0.57 | 0.11 | ||
| 80 |
|
£5.5m | 4.6% | 3,378 | 0.56 | 0.10 |
No players match those filters.
clears the threshold on average
within 15% of it
short of it
the player's own threshold
Minimum 450 minutes played. Per-90 rates are adjusted for sample size, and hit rate is the
modelled chance of clearing the threshold in a full match at that rate, which is what puts a defender on
9.5 actions and a midfielder on 11 on the same scale.
Average defensive actions per 90 across every qualifying outfielder at each club. Sides that spend the game without the ball generate the actions, so this is really a map of where to shop — and a warning, because the same clubs tend to concede the clean sheets you also want.
Defensive contributions, shortened to DefCon by most managers, are the defensive actions Fantasy Premier League awards points for. A defender scores two points in any match where their clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles add up to ten or more. A midfielder or forward needs twelve, and ball recoveries count toward their total as well as those four actions. Goalkeepers are not scored this way at all; they are rewarded through saves.
The critical detail is that this is a threshold, not a rate. The two points are awarded once per match, so a defender who records ten actions and a defender who records twenty score exactly the same. That single fact changes how you should shop for the statistic, and it is where most defensive contribution content goes wrong.
Because the points are a threshold, what you are buying is not a player's average but how often they cross the line. The hit rate column converts each player's rate into the chance of clearing their own bar in a full match, and that is what the board is ranked on by default. It matters most when comparing positions: a defender averaging 9.5 actions is a far better bet for two points than a midfielder averaging 11, because the defender needs ten and the midfielder needs twelve. Sorted on the raw average, the midfielder looks the better player. Sorted on hit rate, the truth shows up.
Two caveats worth stating plainly. The hit rate is modelled from the rate rather than counted from match logs, so it assumes a player's actions arrive at a steady tempo; a genuinely streaky player will beat or miss it. And the rates themselves are adjusted for sample size, because a substitute who made one tackle in one minute of football is not a 90-actions-per-90 player, and a raw per-90 column puts exactly that kind of noise at the top. Only players past 450 minutes appear here at all.
Defensive contributions are worth roughly two points a week to a player who reliably clears the threshold, which over a season is comparable to a handful of goals. That makes them most valuable in cheap defenders and mid-priced midfielders, where two points a week is a large share of what you are paying for, and close to irrelevant in premium attackers you own for goals. The per £m column is that argument in a number: filter to £5.0m and under and sort on it to find the budget picks doing the work.
The trap is buying the statistic in isolation. A midfielder at a club that concedes possession will rack up actions precisely because his team is defending, which usually means fewer attacking returns and fewer clean sheets. That tension is visible in the club table above: the sides at the top generate the most actions and are rarely the sides you want for clean sheets. The players worth owning are the ones who clear the threshold at clubs that also keep the ball out of their own net, and the fixture ticker is where you check the second half of that.
To weigh defensive contributions against everything else a player does, the player explorer has actions per 90 as a sortable column alongside price, minutes and every attacking metric, and the team rater prices the threshold into every projection it makes.