NEW
Introducing New Bet Builder Tool
4 Nov 2026
Build bet builders with the stats switched on. This new innovative tool combines the UI you are familiar with when you place bet builders a…
BETA
VigShift Beta Now Open on OddAlerts!
30 Oct 2026
VigShift watches the sharp market on every match. When informed money hits a price and it drops fast, you get a push within a second, with …
NEWS
The first round of updates to the new Bet Builder
6 Nov 2026
- Top Picks Section on Fixtures - New Overview Section on Index - More Leagues Added (FA Cup, MLS, Belgian Pro, Etc) - Improved Layout on D…
VIDEO
Predictions Show Episode Featuring Bet Builder
6 Nov 2026
🗣️ In this episode of the Predictions Show, founder Joe takes the new Bet Builder tool for a spin to create some interesting combinations f…
NEW
Introducing The Pulse Feature For Insights
6 Nov 2026
It lives at the top of the fixture feed and will show you all of the interesting data it has found across the many tools and metrics on Odd…
For this page
How to Read Match Simulations Match simulations plays every upcoming game 100,000 times and counts what happened: results, goals, scorelines, corners, cards and where the simulated chance beats the price.No guide matches yet. Press enter to search the full text.
We simulated Zhejiang vs Wuhan Three Towns 100,000 times. Zhejiang won 53,265 of them (53.3%), the draw came up 21.4% of the time and Wuhan Three Towns won 25.3%. The most likely score is 2-1 (8.6%), and both teams score in 71.1% of simulations.
Full time 4-1. Before kick-off the simulations had Zhejiang winning 53.3% and gave this exact score 3.8%.
| Zhejiang win | 53.3% |
|---|---|
| Draw | 21.4% |
| Wuhan Three Towns win | 25.3% |
| Most likely score | 2-1 (8.6%) |
| Expected goals | 2.29 – 1.56 |
| Both teams to score | 71.1% |
| Over 1.5 goals | 90.1% |
| Over 2.5 goals | 73.4% |
|---|---|
| Over 3.5 goals | 53.3% |
| Zhejiang score first | 58.4% |
| Wuhan Three Towns score first | 38.5% |
| Zhejiang clean sheet | 21.5% |
| Wuhan Three Towns clean sheet | 10.5% |
Shandong Taishan
Chengdu Rongcheng
1.9–1.7
xG
68%
Over 2.5
Qingdao Hainiu
Shenzhen Peng City
1.2–2.0
xG
62%
Over 2.5
Zhejiang
Henan Songshan Longmen
2.5–1.7
xG
78%
Over 2.5
Beijing Guoan
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
2.4–0.8
xG
62%
Over 2.5
Yunnan Yukun
Wuhan Three Towns
2.8–1.6
xG
80%
Over 2.5
Dalian Yingbo
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
2.1–0.7
xG
52%
Over 2.5
Shanghai Shenhua
Qingdao West Coast
2.4–1.1
xG
66%
Over 2.5
Shanghai Port
Liaoning Tieren FC
2.9–1.0
xG
73%
Over 2.5
Every number on this page comes from one request: 1X2, scorelines, goal lines, halves, HT/FT, Asian handicaps, corners, cards and goal timing, plus the market comparison, value bets and the full expected-goals breakdown. Up to ten fixtures per call.
GET /api/predictions/generate/420519318 ?v=2 &detail=standard &include=value,corners,cards # 100,000 runs: 1X2, scores, goals, halves, # corners, cards, value bets, xG breakdown
Zhejiang are favourites. They win 53.3% of our 100,000 simulations, against 21.4% for the draw and 25.3% for Wuhan Three Towns. Including the draw, Zhejiang avoid defeat 74.7% of the time.
2-1, which came up in 8.6% of simulations. Next are 1-1 (8.4%) and 2-2 (6.6%). No single score is likely on its own, which is why the full spread of scorelines matters.
Both teams score in 71.1% of simulations. Zhejiang keep a clean sheet 21.5% of the time and Wuhan Three Towns 10.5%.
The simulations average 3.85 goals: 2.29 for Zhejiang and 1.56 for Wuhan Three Towns. Over 1.5 goals lands 90.1% of the time, over 2.5 goals 73.4% and over 3.5 goals 53.3%.
Our v2 engine plays the match 100,000 times. It starts from the sharpest betting market (here Pinnacle), blends in each team's recent attack and defence numbers and xG, then uses a Dixon-Coles model so low scores like 0-0 and 1-1 come up as often as they do in real football. Goal times, corners and cards are simulated minute by minute.
Every 20 minutes on matchday and every few hours before that, so it moves with team news and the betting market. The last pre-match run stays on the page after kick-off so you can compare it with the result.